Re: CoC [Final]

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CoC [Final]
Date: 2016-01-18 18:38:42
Message-ID: 20160118183842.GA2499@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:02:33AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> O.k. so I let every thing sit with V7 for several days and we have received
> no further feedback. I believe we have reached a point where we can
> reasonably consider this Final or at least Final Draft.

While the verbiage seems OK with me -- has there been
consensus as to whether we actually want/need a CoC ?

Thanks,
Karsten Hilbert
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

  • CoC [Final] at 2016-01-18 18:02:33 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-18 18:57:30 Re: CoC [Final]
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-18 18:36:48 Re: CoC [Final]