From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Damien Clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ? |
Date: | 2016-01-17 15:28:20 |
Message-ID: | 20160117152820.GA16375@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:27:06PM +0100, Damien Clochard wrote:
>
> >
> >I am curious why you chose that date? I always thought it was the
> >creation of the CVS tree on July 9, 1996.
> >
>
> Clearly I'm not familiar that part of PostgreSQL history but last
> year, Dave told me that the birthdate was the start of the online
> presence, which seems to be 22/10/1996 when Marc Fournier bought the
> postgresql.org domain.
Oh, the website. OK, makes sense.
> I don't really care though. We can define the birthdate as July
> 9,1996. We can even avoid completely defining a specific date and
> simply state that "PostgreSQL was born in 1996". I don't think
> people really care what the date stands for anyway...
>
> To me the most important thing is to have a series of coordinated
> events and actions on a scheduled period. It can be in may, july or
> october... The only problem I see with July is that it's more
> difficult to organize events in the summer (at least in Europe)
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2016-01-17 17:54:06 | Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ? |
Previous Message | Damien Clochard | 2016-01-17 11:27:06 | Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ? |