From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? |
Date: | 2016-01-11 21:36:00 |
Message-ID: | 20160111213600.GA777034@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > How would you feel about the original thread that started this.
> >
> > https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941
>
> I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread
> with (when I looked) 374 messages, but if the gist of it is that
> they have a code of conduct that attempts to control the speech or
> actions of contributors outside of the venue of the lists or events
> of the project, count me as -1, regardless of how offensive I might
> find said speech or actions.
I didn't look at this one either, but I looked at the "contributor
covenant" Regina linked to earlier (as an example of what not to do) and
was shocked to see that any random outsider can *demand* a project admin
to take action on harassment accusations, or have *the admin* be removed
from the project. I found that totally backwards and I'd certainly be
against anything that contains such language.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Saulo Merlo | 2016-01-11 21:37:43 | Re: Slow Query - PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-01-11 21:28:17 | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? |