From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Date: | 2016-01-11 19:18:29 |
Message-ID: | 20160111191829.GA25894@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-01-11 19:15:23 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 11 January 2016 at 19:03, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2016-01-09 15:29:11 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Hmm, I was just preparing this for commit.
> >
> > Just read downthread that you want to commit this soon. Please hold of
> > for a while, this doesn't really look ready to me. I don't have time for
> > a real review right now, but I'll try to get to it asap.
> >
>
> "A real review"? Huh.
All I meant was that my email didn't consist out of a real review, but
just was a quick scan
> > More generally, I'm doubtful that the approach of reading data from WAL
> > as proposed here is a very good idea. It seems better to "just" dump the
> > entire 2pc state into *one* file at checkpoint time.
> >
>
> I think you misunderstand the proposed approach. This isn't just to do
> with reading things back at checkpoint.
Sure, the main purpose is not to write 2pc state files in the common
path - or is that not the main purpose?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-01-11 19:20:59 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-01-11 19:17:20 | Re: Making plpython 2 and 3 coexist a bit better |