Re: Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses
Date: 2016-01-07 15:30:51
Message-ID: 20160107153051.GA424921@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> > * bytea default opclass. This is a type that, like the others, shares
> > its representation with text (a varlena header and some data bytes --
> > a string, essentially). Its comparator already behaves identically to
> > that of the text comparator when the "C" collation is used. I've
> > actually seen a specific request for this [1].
>
> I probably should have given an explanation for why it's okay that NUL
> bytes can exist in strings from the point of view of the generalized
> SortSupport for text worker function. The next revision will have
> comments along those lines.

Did you ever post "the next revision"?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-07 15:41:51 Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-01-07 15:27:46 Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages