Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2016-01-06 20:13:21
Message-ID: 20160106201321.GF7650@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-01-06 21:01:47 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >Although I disagree with some aspects of Andres patch, I'm not a
> >committer and I'm tired of arguing. I'm just planing to do minor changes
> >to Andres version to fix a potential issue if the file is closed which
> >flushing is in progress, but that will not change the overall shape of it.

Are you working on that aspect?

> >So testing on Andres version seems relevant to me.
>
> The patch no longer applies to master. Can someone rebase it?

I'm working on an updated version, trying to mitigate the performance
regressions I observed.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-01-06 20:15:30 Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-01-06 20:09:44 Re: Add numeric_trim(numeric)