Re: Broken lock management in policy.c.

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Broken lock management in policy.c.
Date: 2016-01-04 20:39:58
Message-ID: 20160104203958.GI3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I've pushed an example based on your original test case. Feel free
> > to suggest improvements, although at this point they'll probably
> > land in 9.5.1.
>
> I think that that's a vast improvement. I probably should have pushed
> for a worked out example myself, but there are only so many hours in
> the day.

Agreed on it being a vast improvement and that there are only so many
hours in the day.

> I've reviewed your changes, and have nothing further to add.

Was just doing that myself and I agree that it looks good.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-04 20:44:19 Re: ALTER TABLE behind-the-scenes effects' CONTEXT
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-01-04 20:37:44 Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes