| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> |
| Cc: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |
| Date: | 2015-12-30 18:15:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20151230181507.o5jzqdiw2yswafu5@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-12-30 20:12:07 +0200, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> >
> > Is this in a backend with ssl?
> >
>
> No.
There goes that theory. Amongst others. The aforementioned problem with
waitfor doesn't seem to be actually armed because waitfor is only used
if errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN.
> If you go up one frame, what value does port->sock have?
> For some reason VS is telling me "Unable to read memory" on port->sock... I
> have no idea why that is...
Hm. Is this with a self compiled postgres? If so, is it with assertions
enabled?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-30 18:17:47 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |
| Previous Message | Shay Rojansky | 2015-12-30 18:12:07 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |