| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Known issues on PostgreSQL server 8.1.19 |
| Date: | 2015-12-18 16:22:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20151218162212.GR2618@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thomas Munro wrote:
> How crazy would it be to emit a log message when Postgres comes up and
> discovers that time has moved past the advertised
> known-five-years-in-advance EOL date for the executable's major
> release? (And perhaps another kind of message when the executable's
> minor release is certainly too old, though I have no idea when that
> would be...)
I don't think it's likely that sysadmins that leave their systems
without updates for so long would even consider the idea of looking at
the log files -- much less look for warnings emitted at server start.
People familiar with Postgres would probably notice such a warning, of
course, but we would immediately notice that the minor/major version is
out support just as well.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-18 17:24:13 | Re: BUG #13681: Serialization failures caused by new multixact code of 9.3 (back-patch request) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-18 15:43:42 | Re: to_date() not works as described for pattern DD & HH |