| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #9923: "reassign owned" does not change permissions grantor |
| Date: | 2015-12-17 20:23:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20151217202304.GB27799@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:21:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Backpatching seems fine to me. I was just concerned if anyone was
> > relying on the existing buggy behavior.
>
> Seems unlikely. Even if they are, the potential for catalog corruption
> later seems to trump that argument.
>
> > We do list this item as a 9.5
> > incompatibility, so the question is whether we can add an
> > incompatibility to back branches:
>
> > Fix <link linkend="SQL-REASSIGN-OWNED"><command>REASSIGN OWNED</></>
> > and <link linkend="SQL-ALTERTYPE"><command>ALTER OWNER TO</></>
> > to properly update permissions lists (ACLs) when changing ownership of
> > types, foreign data wrappers, and foreign servers (Bruce Momjian)
>
> Actually, I guess we should take out that 9.5 release note item altogether
> if we back-patch this.
Yes, that was one of my points.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mayan.murad | 2015-12-17 21:17:07 | BUG #13825: JDBC Driver Connection Pool Issue |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-17 20:21:46 | Re: BUG #9923: "reassign owned" does not change permissions grantor |