On 2015-12-17 09:04:25 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > But I'm somewhat confused what this has to do with Andres's report.
>
> Doesn't it explain the exact situation he is in, where the oldest
> database is 200 million, but the cluster as a whole is 2 billion?
There were no crashes, so no, I don't think so.