From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Header unfolding in archived mail |
Date: | 2015-12-16 03:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 20151216032243.GA2407557@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:56:13PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:07:45PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > Per RFC 5322, section 2.2.3:
> > >
> > > The process of moving from this folded multiple-line representation
> > > of a header field to its single line representation is called
> > > "unfolding". Unfolding is accomplished by simply removing any CRLF
> > > that is immediately followed by WSP. Each header field should be
> > > treated in its unfolded form for further syntactic and semantic
> > > evaluation. An unfolded header field has no length restriction and
> > > therefore may be indeterminately long.
> > > I have attached a patch, against pgarchives.git, making its unfolding
> > > code conform to RFC 5322.
> > Ping. Any advice on how to more-thoroughly test the pgarchives.git
> > change, or where I might find the corresponding code affecting "raw"
> > message display?
> This one is entirely on me, I just haven't been able to get around to it
> yet :( It's still on my TODO list though, so I haven't given up on you!
Ping.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2015-12-16 16:32:19 | Spam on the wiki |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-12-13 21:21:38 | Re: Problem with archives -- mail gets lost |