Re: BDR

From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BDR
Date: 2015-12-15 08:49:54
Message-ID: 20151215084954.GA13983@tux
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> On 12/15/2015 12:01 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>> I would like to play with BDR, can i use my 9.5 / 9.6 installation
>> (first attempt fails) or do i have to use 9.4 stable?
>
> 9.5 is a in-development version, 9.6 doesn't even exist, why would you
> want to use anything OTHER than the stable and reliable 9.4 unless
> you're explicitly testing for bugs in 9.5 ?

playing with new features. (9.6 exists as devel, with great features
like parallel seq. scan)

>
> BDR is currently an addon for 9.4, I don't believe its available for 9.5
> yet.

apparently, thx for the answer.

Regards, Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

In response to

  • Re: BDR at 2015-12-15 08:07:31 from John R Pierce

Responses

  • Re: BDR at 2015-12-15 15:00:15 from Craig Ringer

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Westermann 2015-12-15 08:50:44 pg_dump executed on a hosts against another host fails with pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query was: SET search_path = pg_catalog, sys, dbo
Previous Message Jov 2015-12-15 08:49:05 wal receiver process always start after startup process recovering all WALs and need new WAL?