From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |
Date: | 2015-12-09 06:51:19 |
Message-ID: | 20151209.155119.119546137.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
At Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:50:39 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqR7UkYAhiFu=-W6M30Ku-9zSFPQerT1LDLwktyAXzLBQA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > > <please do not top-post, it breaks the logic of the thread>
> >
> > I believe I haven't ripped off any in CC: list or In-Reply-To and
> > References in the previous post. (I read "top-post" as a post
> > without these headers.) Could you let me know how the message
> > was broken?
>
> 20151126(dot)144512(dot)10228250(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp just did that
> when you sent this new patch series:
> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#idp55416272
Thank you for the reference. I made it because I didn't regard it
as a reply to (my) previous message but an update. I'll take care
to avoid top-posting in any case, though.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-09 07:16:16 | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-12-09 06:31:18 | Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries |