Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Date: 2015-12-08 11:43:03
Message-ID: 20151208114303.GR4934@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-12-04 21:55:29 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:03:21PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Sorry, but I really just want to see these changes as iterative patches
> > ontop of 9.5/HEAD instead of this process. I won't revert the reversion
> > if you push it anyway, but I think it's a rather bad idea.
>
> I hear you.

Not just me.

> I evaluated your request and judged that the benefits you cited
> did not make up for the losses I cited. Should you wish to change my mind,
> your best bet is to find defects in the commits I proposed. If I introduced
> juicy defects, that discovery would lend much weight to your conjectures.

I've absolutely no interest in "proving you wrong". And my desire to
review patches that are in a, in my opinion, barely reviewable format is
pretty low as well.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-08 11:50:39 Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2015-12-08 11:40:59 Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)