| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers |
| Date: | 2015-12-01 21:19:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20151201211908.GB18060@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 03:35:39PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Well, you'd have to use MacPorts' version of the openssl libraries,
> > too, since there'd be no certainty that their headers match the
> > Apple-provided libraries (in fact, I'd bet a lot that they don't).
> > This would be a pain if you wanted to put your compiled PG executables
> > on some other Mac.
>
> Yeah, I guess it means that people building for MacOS X will probably
> have to ship OpenSSL as a dependency, which also means that they will
> need to update it when new versions are released. That is already a
> pretty obnoxious disease on Windows, and it's unfortunate to see it
> spreading. It would save us a good deal of staff time here at
> EnterpriseDB if we didn't have to do new releases of everything on
> Windows every time there is an OpenSSL update.
Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
together?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-01 21:40:09 | Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-01 20:35:39 | Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers |