Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kouber Saparev <kouber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Date: 2015-11-27 20:47:57
Message-ID: 20151127204757.GF4320@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
> >> transaction do it?
>
> > I tried and couldn't find a way to cause one to appear. When a row is
> > created, it has xmax=0 so when it's deleted the xmax can just be set to
> > the deleting xact. And we don't ever update pg_toast rows, AFAIK.
>
> Ah, nevermind, brain fade ... I was momentarily confusing this with
> combo CIDs. Right, there are no updates or row locks taken on toast
> table rows (unless someone were to do one manually?)

Both UPDATE and SELECT FOR UPDATE fail right away:

alvherre=# update pg_toast.pg_toast_16398 set chunk_id = 7 where chunk_id = 5;
ERROR: cannot change TOAST relation "pg_toast_16398"

alvherre=# select * from pg_toast.pg_toast_16398 for update;
ERROR: cannot lock rows in TOAST relation "pg_toast_16398"

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouber Saparev 2015-11-28 10:52:58 Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-27 20:35:26 Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId