Re: pg_upgrade with --link then pg_basebackup for replication

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jorge Torralba <jorge(dot)torralba(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade with --link then pg_basebackup for replication
Date: 2015-11-04 14:49:58
Message-ID: 20151104144958.GA15722@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 04:39:02PM -0800, Jorge Torralba wrote:
> Here is an odd question.
>
> If one was to upgrade Postgres to 9.4 from 9.1 using the --link option, then
> setup replication using pg_basebackup, would the standby server preserve the
> hard links with the pg_basebackup or will -D /new/destination/data/dir be a
> clean unlinked version?

I will be clean. If you want to upgrade the the standby to 9.4 without
a new basebackup, see this blog entry:

http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2015.html#June_10_2015

> Afterwards, if failing over to standby then failing back, would that implement
> a non linked version back on the primary if specifying a new data directory as
> well ?

The links are only created on the server you run pg_upgrade, meaning
normally not on the standby.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas SIMON 2015-11-04 15:04:35 Slow queries in hot standby
Previous Message Shih Théo 2015-11-04 09:30:52 postgres: archiver process failed on XXXXXXXX