From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Date: | 2015-10-22 16:26:46 |
Message-ID: | 20151022162646.GA22539@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:15:35PM +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> Hello.
> Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a
> full plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the
> under task parallel query does not have such a problem?
>
> > This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we don't
> > have a generic plan tree walker,
>
> I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header
> files and generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and
> etc trees), as well as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb.
> Maybe I should publish this code?
Please do.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-22 16:34:55 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #13694: Row Level Security by-passed with CREATEUSER permission |
Previous Message | YUriy Zhuravlev | 2015-10-22 16:15:35 | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |