From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: September 2015 Commitfest |
Date: | 2015-10-22 07:21:23 |
Message-ID: | 20151022072123.GA8952@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-10-22 10:52:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> We are close to the end of October, and the numbers are a bit more
> encouraging than at the beginning:
FWIW, I think this has been a commitfest with frustratingly low review
participation outside a few patches.
> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
> entries first?
I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the
next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real
review.
> Also, to all reviewers and authors, please be sure that the status of
> your patch is correctly updated.
Yes, please!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-10-22 07:47:09 | Re: [PATCH v3] GSSAPI encryption support |
Previous Message | dinesh kumar | 2015-10-22 07:20:36 | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |