Re: recent Gartner's publication

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: recent Gartner's publication
Date: 2015-10-15 20:59:25
Message-ID: 20151015205925.GA22023@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:38:06PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 08:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >All,
> >
> >If Gartner gets even half the information correct, I feel pretty good
> >about it.
>
> +1

Kevin Grittner saw Oleg's original post and started a discussion inside
EDB. Although some EDB staff read the report before, no one realized
its inaccuracies or possible misinterpretations. EDB will work with
Gartner to try to get the current report, or next year's report,
improved. They are not certain of success, but they will try.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2015-10-16 07:42:06 Re: recent Gartner's publication
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-10-15 03:38:06 Re: recent Gartner's publication