From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
Date: | 2015-09-27 18:10:32 |
Message-ID: | 20150927181032.GO295765@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com> writes:
> > > > I've read elsewhere that a possible solution is to provide a
> > > > mail address associated with a message (displayed on the web interface)
> > > > that routes your mail message to the thread.
> > >
> > > Seems awfully like a here-please-spam-us button.
> >
> > Yeah, that doesn't sound good. What I think would be workable is to
> > create a feature that emails you an archived message, and requires that
> > you're logged in with your community account. That sounds hard enough
> > to abuse by spammers and convenient enough for actual users.
> >
> > I wonder if it would break stuff like DKIM signatures, SPF checks, and
> > the like.
>
> It probably would -- but not more than just the mailinglist already does?
Yeah, good point ...
So how hard would you think this would be?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-09-27 18:34:32 | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-09-27 18:08:42 | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |