Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed
Date: 2015-09-27 18:10:32
Message-ID: 20150927181032.GO295765@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com> writes:
> > > > I've read elsewhere that a possible solution is to provide a
> > > > mail address associated with a message (displayed on the web interface)
> > > > that routes your mail message to the thread.
> > >
> > > Seems awfully like a here-please-spam-us button.
> >
> > Yeah, that doesn't sound good. What I think would be workable is to
> > create a feature that emails you an archived message, and requires that
> > you're logged in with your community account. That sounds hard enough
> > to abuse by spammers and convenient enough for actual users.
> >
> > I wonder if it would break stuff like DKIM signatures, SPF checks, and
> > the like.
>
> It probably would -- but not more than just the mailinglist already does?

Yeah, good point ...

So how hard would you think this would be?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-09-27 18:34:32 Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-09-27 18:08:42 Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed