| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Date: | 2015-09-24 20:07:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20150924200703.GG3685@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > Are there any objections to pginfra standing up bugs.postgresql.org with
> > debbugs? Obviously, it'd be more-or-less beta as we play with it, and
> > we could set it up as beta-bugs.p.o, if there's concern about that.
>
> I agree with the idea that we don't yet want to give the impression that
> this is the official bug tracker. However, "beta-bugs" could give the
> impression that it was specifically for bugs about 9.5beta, without
> dispelling the idea that it is official. Maybe "bugs-test.p.o"?
Works for me.
> (But let's not spend too much time bikeshedding the site name.)
Agreed.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-24 20:08:00 | Re: Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2015-09-24 20:06:03 | Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS |