Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date: 2015-09-24 15:43:10
Message-ID: 20150924154310.GE5702@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-09-23 17:29:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, I can't vouch for what any human being on earth has thought
> about over a twenty-year period. It's not intrinsically unreasonable
> in my mind to want to alter an operator to point at a different
> procedure.

Wouldn't we use plan invalidation to deal with that anyway?

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2015-09-24 15:47:50 GIN vacuum bug
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-24 15:41:08 Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query