| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: creating extension including dependencies |
| Date: | 2015-09-16 22:48:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20150916224818.GN2086@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-16 19:46:10 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > > @@ -91,8 +92,38 @@ CREATE EXTENSION [ IF NOT EXISTS ] <replaceable class="parameter">extension_name
> > > The name of the schema in which to install the extension's
> > > objects, given that the extension allows its contents to be
> > > relocated. The named schema must already exist.
> > > - If not specified, and the extension's control file does not specify a
> > > - schema either, the current default object creation schema is used.
> > > + If not specified, and the extension control file does not define
> > > + <literal>schema</> either, the current default object creation
> > > + schema is used.
> > > + </para>
> >
> > Imo still a spurious change.
>
> I think some more work is needed in this file -- ISTM the rules used to
> determine the creation schema under CASCADE should not be placed within
> the SCHEMA clause explanation.
Hm. Why not? Seems to make sense in the context of that page?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-09-16 22:56:09 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-16 22:46:10 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |