From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
Date: | 2015-09-16 22:12:10 |
Message-ID: | 20150916221210.GK2086@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-20 09:59:25 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Is there any significant interest in either of these?
>
> Josh Berkus tells me that he would like pg_controldata information, and I
> was a bit interested in pg_config information, for this reason: I had a
> report of someone who had configured using --with-libxml but the xml tests
> actually returned the results that are expected without xml being
> configured. The regression tests thus passed, but should not have. It
> occurred to me that if we had a test like
>
> select pg_config('configure') ~ '--with-libxml' as has_xml;
>
> in the xml tests then this failure mode would be detected.
On my reading of the thread there seems to be a tenative agreement that
pg_controldata is useful and still controversy around pg_config. Can we
split committing this?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-09-16 22:33:19 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-09-16 21:52:03 | Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs |