| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow. |
| Date: | 2015-09-14 17:05:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20150914170532.GE9666@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-14 12:03:31 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 9/13/15 2:43 AM, David Rowley wrote:
> >Are you worried about this because I've not focused on optimising float
> >timestamps as much as int64 timestamps? Are there many people compiling
> >with float timestamps in the real world?
>
> My $0.02: the default was changed some 5 years ago so FP time is probably
> pretty rare now. I don't think it's worth a bunch of extra work to speed
> them up.
Agreed. That's not why I'm arguing for it. It's about having kind of duplicate
code that's not exercised at al. by any common setup.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-09-14 17:23:29 | Re: Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-09-14 17:03:31 | Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow. |