| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
| Date: | 2015-09-10 00:58:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20150910005858.GF12694@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-04 23:35:42 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> This looks OK. You saw that I was proposing to solve this problem a
> different way ("Summary of plans to avoid the annoyance of Freezing"),
> suggesting that we wait for a few CFs to see if a patch emerges for that -
> then fall back to this patch if it doesn't? So I am moving this patch to
> next CF.
As noted on that other thread I don't think that's a good policy, and it
seems like Robert agrees with me. So I think we should move this back to
"Needs Review".
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-09-10 03:05:24 | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
| Previous Message | Charles Sheridan | 2015-09-10 00:55:45 | Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ? |