From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: function parse_ident |
Date: | 2015-09-09 19:55:58 |
Message-ID: | 20150909195558.GG2912@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I cannot to use current SplitIdentifierString because it is designed for
> different purpose - and it cannot to separate non identifier part. But the
> code is simple - and will be cleaned.
>
> postgres=# select * from parse_ident('"AHOJ".NAZDAR[]'::text);
> ┌───────────────┬───────┐
> │ parts │ other │
> ╞═══════════════╪═══════╡
> │ {AHOJ,nazdar} │ [] │
> └───────────────┴───────┘
> (1 row)
Um. Now this is really getting into much of the same territory I got
into with the objname/objargs arrays for pg_get_object_address. I think
the "other" bit is a very poor solution to that.
If you want to be able to parse names for all kinds of objects, you need
a solution much more complex than this function. I think a clean
solution returns three sets of things; one is the primary part of the
name, which is an array of text; the second is the secondary name, which
is another array of text; the third is an array of TypeName.
For the name of a relation, only the first of these arrays is used. For
the name of objects subsidiary to a relation, the first two are used
(the first array is the name of the relation itself, and the second
array is the name of the object; for instance a constraint name, or a
trigger name).
The array of type names is necessary because the parsing of TypeName is
completely unlike parsing of plain names. You need [] decorator and
typmod. If you consider objects such as casts, you need two TypeNames
("from" and "to"), hence this is an array and not a single one. As far
as I recall there are other object types that also need more than one
TypeName.
For the name of a function, you need the first text array, and the array
of TypeName which are the input argument types.
If you don't want to have all this complexity, I think you need to forgo
the idea of the "other" thingy that you propose above, and just concern
yourself with the first bits. I don't think "AHOJ".NAZDAR[] is an
identifier.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-09-09 20:07:08 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-09-09 19:45:54 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |