Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members
Date: 2015-09-05 01:07:34
Message-ID: 20150905010734.GA3041856@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:31:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > This is the first time I've seen an indication that the
> > start_postmaster change mentioned in the comment is actually important
> > for production use, rather than just being cleanup.

I scratched my head awhile without thinking of a credible production use case
that would notice the difference. Which one did you have in mind?

> Note that this makes the test case in question fail reliably, which is
> reasonable behavior IMO so I just changed the test.

That's the better behavior, agreed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rugal Bernstein 2015-09-05 01:27:33 Re: A better translation version of Chinese for psql/po/zh_CN.po file
Previous Message Amit Langote 2015-09-05 00:52:09 Re: BRIN INDEX value