Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding
Date: 2015-09-03 02:58:26
Message-ID: 20150903025826.GD23640@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 07:50:25PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> >Can you explain why logical replication is better than binary
> >replication for this use-case?
> >
>
> Selectivity?

I was assuming you would just create identical slaves to handle failure,
rather than moving selected data around.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-09-03 03:01:31 Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-09-03 02:50:25 Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding