Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Date: 2015-09-01 18:12:22
Message-ID: 20150901181222.GK31526@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 2015-09-01 14:07:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> But I think it's quite wrong to assume that the infrastructure for
> this is available and usable everywhere, because in my experience,
> that's far from the case.

Especially when the alternative is a rather short patch implementing an
otherwise widely available feature.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Catalin Iacob 2015-09-01 18:20:51 Re: Adding since-version tags to the docs?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-01 18:11:21 Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-09-02 08:52:45 Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-01 18:07:19 Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.