Re: pg_upgrade + Extensions

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Smitha Pamujula <smitha(dot)pamujula(at)iovation(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Grant Holly <grant(dot)holly(at)iovation(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade + Extensions
Date: 2015-08-31 23:32:30
Message-ID: 20150831233230.GB9753@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:28:00PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/31/2015 07:21 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> >On Aug 31, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> >>>I think it would help if its noted somewhere in the document as it would have
> >>>helped us save some time understanding why it was failing and why it was
> >>>looking for json_build.
> >>The problem is that this is a rare case where you had an extension that
> >>was later included in Postgres.
> >Maybe not so rare. Thanks to Andrew, we’ve had to do this for both 9.2-9.3 (json_object) and 9.3-9.4 (json_build).
> >
>
>
> Yeah, a lot of people don't like to wait for new stuff. :-)

It might make the most sense to mention this method in the release notes
of the extension. However, I assume they are not using the extension in
the new server so their is no release to look at.

Still, I don't know how many people are doing this, but the right fix is
to get the names of the modules that are superceeded and tell pg_upgrade
to skip them.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Smitha Pamujula 2015-08-31 23:41:58 Re: pg_upgrade + Extensions
Previous Message Sumedh Pathak 2015-08-31 23:28:37 Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding