Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files.
Date: 2015-08-28 14:17:44
Message-ID: 20150828141744.GC21830@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:41:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 08:44:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> >> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> >> > Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files.
> >> >
> >> > This makes it possible to use the functions without getting errors, if there
> >> > is a chance that the file might be removed or renamed concurrently.
> >> > pg_rewind needs to do just that, although this could be useful for other
> >> > purposes too. (The changes to pg_rewind to use these functions will come in
> >> > a separate commit.)
> >> >
> >> > The read_binary_file() function isn't very well-suited for extensions.c's
> >> > purposes anymore, if it ever was. So bite the bullet and make a copy of it
> >> > in extension.c, tailored for that use case. This seems better than the
> >> > accidental code reuse, even if it's a some more lines of code.
> >>
> >> This has been done done as the part of a fix for the issues with
> >> pg_rewind, but perhaps it should be mentioned in the release notes?
> >
> > Yes, I will pick up that change during the creation of the 9.6 release
> > notes.
>
> Even if it has been introduced in 9.5?

Well, this is where I got lost then, because I only see it going into
master, which, uh, I thought was 9.6, but I am now realizing this was
committed before we branched. :-( This will be picked up when the 9.5
release notes are updated to match git.

Actually, I now see this in the 9.5 release notes:

<simpara>Current as of 2015-08-03</simpara>

This was updated by Tom:

ecc2d16b (Tom Lane 2015-08-03 12:29:10 -0400 10) <simpara>Current as of 2015-08-03</simpara>

and I see Tom added it properly:

<!--
2015-06-28 [cb2acb1] Heikki..: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for..
-->
<para>
Add an optional <replaceable>missing_ok</> argument to <link
linkend="functions-admin-genfile-table"><function>pg_read_file()</></>
and related functions (Michael Paquier, Heikki Linnakangas)
</para>
</listitem>

so, after all that detail, I think we are good.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-08-28 14:21:33 Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-08-28 12:41:08 Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files.