Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-17 16:36:43
Message-ID: 20150817163643.GC10786@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-08-17 12:30:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> - The possibility that may repeatedly break #define FRONTEND
> compilation when we add static inline functions, where instead adding
> macros would not have caused breakage, thus resulting in continual
> tinkering with the header files.

Again, that's really independent. Inlines have that problem, even with
STATIC_IF_INLINE. C.f. MemoryContextSwitch() and a9baeb361d.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-08-17 16:54:26 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-17 16:30:56 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6