| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Test code is worth the space |
| Date: | 2015-08-13 01:24:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20150813012445.GR3685@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > The regression tests included in pgBackRest (available here:
> > https://github.com/pgmasters/backrest) go through a number of different
> > recovery tests. There's vagrant configs for a few different VMs too
> > (CentOS 6, CentOS 7, Ubuntu 12.04 and Ubuntu 14.04) which is what we've
> > been testing.
> > We're working to continue expanding those tests and will also be adding
> > tests for replication and promotion in the future. Eventually, we plan
> > to write a buildfarm module for pgBackRest, to allow it to be run in the
> > same manner as the regular buildfarm animals with the results posted.
>
> Interesting. Do you mind if I pick up from it some ideas for the
> in-core replication test suite based on TAP stuff? That's still in the
> works for the next CF.
Certainly don't mind at all, entirely open source under the MIT
license.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vignesh Raghunathan | 2015-08-13 01:25:30 | Parsing tuple contents |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-08-13 01:22:59 | Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication |