Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-12 02:34:40
Message-ID: 20150812023440.GA1940458@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:04:48PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-08-05 15:46:36 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2015-08-05 15:08:29 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > We might later want to change some of the harder to maintain macros to
> > > inline functions, but that seems better done separately.
> >
> > Here's a conversion for fastgetattr() and heap_getattr()

> Slightly updated version attached.

> In my opinion this drastically increases readability and thus should be
> applied. Will do so sometime tomorrow unless there's protest.

-1 to introducing more inline functions before committable code replaces what
you've already pushed for this thread.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-08-12 03:49:54 Re: Reducing ClogControlLock contention
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-12 02:23:57 Re: can't coax query planner into using all columns of a gist index