From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Date: | 2015-08-07 01:38:46 |
Message-ID: | 20150807013846.GS13687@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:05:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I'm working on integrating the suggestions I made last week to the
> > release notes. Would anybody mind if I start to add commit ids in
> > comments, similar to what Tom has done for minor releases, to news
> > items?
>
> +1. Helps confirm which items are meant to correspond to which commits.
>
> In case you didn't realize it already, the stuff I put into the minor
> release notes is from src/tools/git_changelog. Dunno whether we need
> to use that exact format for major releases though; there's no need to
> identify branches in major release notes.
Gee, if I had known we wanted to do this for major releases I could have
done it at the time I created the 9.5 release notes. It has to be
harder to do it after the fact. Should I do it for 9.6?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-08-07 01:40:00 | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-08-07 01:08:57 | Re: 9.5 release notes |