| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2015-08-06 14:31:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20150806143153.GA12526@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-06 10:29:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > It really doesn't. It's just fallout from indirectly including lwlock.h
> > which includes an atomic variable. The include path leading to it is
> >
> > In file included from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/storage/lwlock.h:19:0,
> > from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/storage/lock.h:18,
> > from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/access/tuptoaster.h:18,
> > from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c:49:
> > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/port/atomics.h:41:2: error: #error "THOU SHALL NOT REQUIRE ATOMICS"
> > #error "THOU SHALL NOT REQUIRE ATOMICS"
>
> Isn't that #include entirely superfluous?
Which one?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-08-06 14:33:06 | Re: 9.5 release notes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-08-06 14:29:39 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |