From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hash index creation warning |
Date: | 2015-08-06 03:35:15 |
Message-ID: | 20150806033515.GH13687@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40:27AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> WARNING: hash indexes are not crash-safe, not replicated, and their
> >> use is discouraged
> >
> > +1
>
> I'm not wild about this rewording; I think that if users don't know
> what WAL is, they probably need to know that in order to make good
> decisions about whether to use hash indexes. But I don't feel
> super-strongly about it.
Coming late to this, but I think Robert is right. WAL is used for crash
recovery, PITR, and streaming replication, and I am not sure we want to
specify all of those in the warning message.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-08-06 04:53:41 | Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-08-06 03:31:30 | Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend |