Re: RLS restrictive hook policies

Dean,

* Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 16:09, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > * Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> >> Agreed. I'm happy to commit that change and back-patch it to 9.5,
> >> barring objections. Given that the only way to have restrictive
> >> policies currently is using hooks, I don't believe there's any
> >> documentation update required either; of course, I'll update the comment
> >> to reflect this discussion/decision and make any necessary changes to
> >> test_rls_hooks.
> >
> > Patch attached to make this change, with appropriate comment updates and
> > fixes to the test_rls_hooks modules.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
>
> Looks good to me.

Thanks! Pushed to master and 9.5.

Stephen