Re: LWLock deadlock and gdb advice

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock deadlock and gdb advice
Date: 2015-08-02 15:05:06
Message-ID: 20150802150506.GH11473@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-08-02 17:04:07 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> I've attached a version of the patch that should address Heikki's
> concern. It imo also improves the API and increases debuggability by not
> having stale variable values in the variables anymore. (also attached is
> a minor optimization that Heikki has noticed)

...

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-issues-around-the-variable-support-in-the-lwlock.patch text/x-patch 13.8 KB
0002-Micro-optimize-LWLockAttemptLock-a-bit.patch text/x-patch 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2015-08-02 16:03:02 pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-08-02 15:04:07 Re: LWLock deadlock and gdb advice