From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?) |
Date: | 2015-07-28 17:00:01 |
Message-ID: | 20150728170001.GC4726@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-07-28 18:59:02 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> Attached are:
>
> a) a slightly evolved version of Michael's patch disabling renegotiation
> by default that I'm planning to apply to 9.4 - 9.0
>
> b) a patch removing renegotiation entirely from master and 9.5
>
> Unless somebody protests soon I'm going to push something like that
> after having dinner.
>
> I am wondering whether b) ought to remove Port->count, but I'm currently
> leaning to leaving it in place for now; perhaps adding a comment in the
> struct. I'm actually thinking we very well might want to add something
> like it to all backends, but more importantly it'd make the diff larger
> with mostly unrelated changes.
And really attached.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
94-and-older.patch | text/x-patch | 3.6 KB |
master-and-95.patch | text/x-patch | 9.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-07-28 17:04:45 | Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-07-28 16:59:02 | Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?) |