From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Florent Guiliani <florent(at)guiliani(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Retrieve the snapshot's LSN |
Date: | 2015-07-16 16:54:49 |
Message-ID: | 20150716165449.GR5520@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-07-16 12:40:07 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Florent Guiliani <florent(at)guiliani(dot)fr> wrote:
> > During slot creation, the snapshot building and exporting code seems
> > highly coupled with the logical decoding stuff. It doesn't seems much
> > reusable to retrieve the snapshot's LSN outside of logical decoding.
>
> I don't think "the snapshot's LSN" has a well-defined meaning in
> general. The obvious meaning would be "the LSN such that all commits
> prior to that LSN are visible and all later commits are invisible",
> but such an LSN need not exist. Suppose A writes a commit record at
> LSN 0/10000, and then B writes a commit record at 0/10100, and then B
> calls ProcArrayEndTransaction(). At this point, B is visible and A is
> not visible, even though A's commit record precedes that of B.
Well, in combination with logical decoding it kinda has one: It should
allow you to take a dump of the database with a certain snapshot and
replay all transactions with a commit lsn bigger than the "snapshot's
lsn" and end up with a continually consistent database.
Visibility for HS actually works precisely in commit LSN order, even if
that is possibly different than on the primary...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-16 17:07:55 | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-07-16 16:42:07 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file |