| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Information of pg_stat_ssl visible to all users |
| Date: | 2015-07-02 19:52:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20150702195201.GO3289@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Actually, I think the whole view shouldn't be accessible to unprivileged
> > users, except maybe your own row.
> >
> I could go for some of the others if we think there's reason, but I don't
> understand the dn part?
>
> I guess there's some consistency in actually blocking exactly everything...
One case that I remember popping up every so often was "I don't want
people to know what other customers I have in the same database
cluster". We leak these details all over the place (catalogs that can
be queried directly, as well as pg_stat_activity itself, etc), so just
changing the new view would accomplish nothing. If there's interest in
closing these holes, this might be a first step.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-07-02 19:53:40 | Re: Add checksums without --initdb |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-07-02 19:45:16 | Re: Add checksums without --initdb |