| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
| Date: | 2015-06-29 22:12:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20150629221216.GN30708@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-06-29 17:58:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah we are. The only places you'll find where we aren't formatting to 77
> or 78 columns or so are where it would require breaking SGML tags in weird
> places.
Which isn't exactly infrequent...
Anyway, how about:
format:%cd [%h] %<(8,trunc)%cN: %<(49,trunc)%s
(which you can configure as pretty.pgmajor or so in .gitconfig btw.)
> (There are two different things to worry about here. One is how you're
> going to reverse-engineer the annotations into the release notes Bruce
> already made. Even un-truncated first lines of commit messages will often
> not be enough for matching up commits to those notes. But I'm thinking
> more about how we do this in future release cycles, and for that, getting
> git_changelog to help is clearly the ticket.)
I'm not against doing that.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2015-06-29 22:30:42 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-06-29 22:07:09 | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |