Re: Nitpicking: unnecessary NULL-pointer check in pg_upgrade's controldata.c

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nitpicking: unnecessary NULL-pointer check in pg_upgrade's controldata.c
Date: 2015-06-26 13:49:24
Message-ID: 20150626134924.GF4797@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-06-26 09:44:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't mind committing patches for this kind of thing if it makes the
> Coverity reports easier to deal with, which I gather that it does.

It takes about three seconds to mark it as ignored which will hide it
going forward.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marco Nenciarini 2015-06-26 13:50:41 Re: [BUGS] BUG #13473: VACUUM FREEZE mistakenly cancel standby sessions
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-06-26 13:47:25 Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments