Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-06-13 10:52:22
Message-ID: 20150613105222.GS133018@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
> the output here:
>
> http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
>
> and it will eventually appear here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release.html
>
> I am ready to make suggested adjustments, though I am traveling for
> conferences for the next ten days so there might a delay in my replies.

Many people have commented on the "RETURN WHERE" text. The item in
question is this:
Have CREATE TABLE AS and REFRESH return an OID

This code was later changed to return ObjectAddress rather than OID;
this is used to feed event triggers. To answer the "where" question:
the OID is returned to ProcessUtilitySlow, where it can be used by the
DDL-command-collection infrastructure.

I don't think this particular change needs a mention in the release
notes, since the ddl command collection is mentioned separately. I
would just remove it.

In the pg_upgrade section, I think this is a bit strangely worded:
Remove pg_upgrade support for 8.3 old clusters (Bruce Momjian)
How about this?
Remove support for upgrading from 8.3 clusters (Bruce Momjian)

Why do we need a separate mention that pg_upgrade_support was moved to
backend in the "Additional Modules" section? Seems to me that having
it mentioned in the pg_upgrade section would be better.

This entry is missing a word at the end:
Allow CURRENT/SESSION_USER to specify the current user in
certain

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-13 11:02:26 Re: On columnar storage
Previous Message deavid 2015-06-13 09:41:14 Re: Is it possible to have a "fast-write" Index?