Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-06-13 01:47:29
Message-ID: 20150613014729.GA29422@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:16:07PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> >> Would you also be able to mention something aboutf15821e andd222585 ?
>
> > I am going to defer to Tom on that. I have added optimizer changes in
> > the past but he didn't feel it made sense unless there was some
> > user-visible change.
>
> I'd be inclined to document both of those. We mentioned outer join
> removal when it was first added, in 9.0, so making a significant
> improvement in it seems worthy of mention also. Both of these things
> are "user visible" to the extent that they affect EXPLAIN output.
>
> I'm not sure whether we need to document the semantic hazard that the
> second commit message worries about.

OK, I have added two items; applied patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
optimizer.diff text/x-diff 847 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2015-06-13 02:02:42 Re: could not truncate directory "pg_subtrans": apparent wraparound
Previous Message deavid 2015-06-13 01:17:49 Re: Is it possible to have a "fast-write" Index?