Re: messed up message/rfc822 in archives.pg.org

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, sysadmins(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: messed up message/rfc822 in archives.pg.org
Date: 2015-06-11 03:13:05
Message-ID: 20150611031305.GC133018@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > I tried to make up for it by bouncing the message to pgsql-jobs, but
> > that didn't work; I assume Exim or something determined that the message
> > was spam since it wasn't coming from whom was the real sender address.
> > I don't think this is really workable anyway.
>
> Are you sure this isn't just spam? I received recruitment spam about a
> Postgres DBA job in Berlin today. Some recruiter sent this to my
> personal e-mail address, and I marked it as spam.

I am not, but I view these job offers as possibly very valuable for some
people, and therefore I strive not to lose any.

> I classify it as spam because had the recruiter taken 2 seconds to
> consider what he was doing, he would not have sent it. Clearly getting
> me to move from San Francisco to Berlin to go from hacking on Postgres
> to being an ordinary DBA is an impossibly hard sell.

Well, I'm not eager to work as a DBA either, but then I'm not everybody.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2015-06-11 09:52:31 Re: [sysadmins] messed up message/rfc822 in archives.pg.org
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-06-11 02:14:25 Re: messed up message/rfc822 in archives.pg.org